By consent, the High Court ordered the petitioner to pay Rs. 30,000 to the respondent to satisfy an impugned order regarding an industrial dispute, subject to the rights pending in the Labour Court.
Payment of Rs. 30,000 by petitioner to respondent; quashing of impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment: 03.04.2018
M/S. KAILASH RIBBON FACTORY LTD. .... Petitioner Through: Mr.Raj Rishi, Advocate.
versus
VINOD PANDEY ..... Respondent Through: Mr.R.S.Jena, Advocate with respondent in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
VINOD GOEL, J. (ORAL)
(i) That the petitioner shall pay a total sum of Rs.30,000/- to the respondent in complete satisfaction of the impugned order dated 13.10.2016.
(ii) The amount of Rs.30,000/- deposited by the petitioner shall be released by the Registry to the respondent and on such release, the respondent shall not have any claim covered by the impugned order dated 13.10.2016 against the petitioner.
Page 1 of 2
W.P. (C) 1973/2017
(iii) This shall be without prejudice to the rights and contentions of both the parties in Industrial Dispute pending before the Court of Shri Lokesh Kumar Sharma, Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Dwarka.
(VINOD GOEL)
JUDGE
APRIL 03, 2018
dkb
Page 2 of 2
W.P. (C) 1973/2017
M/S. Kailash Ribbon Factory Ltd.
Vinod Pandey
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
