Petitioner withdrew the writ petition admitting arbitration proceedings under Section 11 were pending. Withdrawn petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
..... Petitioner
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh,Sr. Standing Counsel
After some submissions and conceding the fact that an application
under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act is pending
consideration before this Court, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to
withdraw the writ petition. The same is dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
MARCH 05, 2018 /ak
M/S RAITANI ENGINEERING WORKS PVT. LTD
UNION OF INDIA
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
