It is conceded by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondent No.2 has filed an appeal before Appellate Tribunal MCD and the Appellate Tribunal MCD has stayed the order of demolition on April 18, 2017. He also states, as the petitioner cannot seek his impleadment before the Appellate Tribunal, he has filed this petition. He states he would be satisfied if at least the petitioner is allowed to intervene in the appeal for a limited purpose of filing written submissions. Mr. Rajan Sabharwal and the learned counsel for the respondent No.2 have no objection in that regard. The writ petition is disposed of as not pressed with a direction to the petitioner to file an application for intervention before the Tribunal to the extent of allowing him to file written submissions. If such an application is filed, the Appellate Tribunal MCD shall consider the application favourably and allow intervention for the purpose of filing written submissions.