The petitioner withdrew the writ petition with liberty to raise all grounds before the appropriate court of jurisdiction. The writ petition and pending applications were dismissed as withdrawn.
Dismissal of the writ petition and pending applications with liberty to raise the grounds before the jurisdictional court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~44
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr.Kunal Bhargava and Mr.Farman Ali, Advocates for R-1 & 2. Mr.Digvijay Rai and Mr.Kustubh Singh, Advocates for R-3 & 4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R % 17.12.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, wishes to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to raise all grounds raised in the present petition, before the appropriate court of jurisdiction.
The present writ petition along with pending applications are dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed.
G.S.SISTANI, J
JYOTI SINGH, J
DECEMBER 17, 2018/ ssc
M/S The 3 R Technologies
Union of India
G.S. Sistani
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
