The petitioner sought a direction impounding the appointment of a Presiding Officer for the Family Court (North-West District), Rohini. The Court was informed that the appointment process is underway and was disposed of by granting liberty to apply afresh.
Petitioner granted liberty to apply afresh after six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
BHAWNA SOOD ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr G. P. Thareja, Mr Satyam Thareja and Mr Sushant Sharma, Advocates.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr Devesh Singh, ASC, GNCTD with Ms Neelam Kholiya, Advocate for R-1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 13.02.2018
CM No.5602/2018
W.P.(C) 1355/2018
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
FEBRUARY 13, 2018 MK
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner be granted liberty to approach the Court afresh regarding the appointment of a Presiding Officer for the Family Court (North-West District), Rohini.
Whether the obligation to appoint a Presiding Officer has been discharged sufficiently to warrant dismissal of the petition.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
BHAWNA SOOD
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
