The Court allowed the writ petition challenging the rejection of an appeal by the Divisional Commissioner. The Court held that appeals under Rule 22 are not limited to senior citizens and remanded the matter for a merit-based consideration.
Petition allowed; matter remanded to the Divisional Commissioner for consideration of the appeal on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~34
MANISH KUMAR & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr Prem Chhetri, Mr Manoj Choudhary and Mr Pramod Kumar, Advocates.
versus
PRAKASH CHAND & ANR ..... Respondents Through
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 10.12.2018
CM No.51671/2018
W.P.(C) 13291/2018 & CM No. 51672/2018
the decision of this Court in W.P.(C).11703/2018 decided on 13.11.2018 .
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
DECEMBER 10, 2018 MK
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an appeal under Rule 22(3)(4) of the Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules, 2009 is limited only to senior citizens or available to other parties as well.
Whether the maintenance order passed by the District Magistrate dated 10.09.2018 should be implemented during the pendency of the appeal.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.(C).11703/2018Referred¶13
W.P.(C).11703/2018 decided on 13.11.2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MANISH KUMAR & ANR
PRAKASH CHAND & ANR
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
