Petitioner complained of traffic mismanagement at Delhi entry points, specifically Gurugram. Court held this falls within respondents' domain.
Direction to respondents to treat the petition as a representation and take a view thereon.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
Through: Mr. Vaibhav Mishra, Advocate with petitioner in person.
versus
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR
..... Respondents Through: Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain, Advocate for R-1 (NHAI). Mr. Satyakam, Additional Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Mr. Ram Tirth, Delhi Police (Traffic) ASI Mahabir Singh, ZO Kapashera Traffic Circle SI Ram Tirath, Pairvi officer, Traffic
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
authorities to take steps to ensure smooth flow of traffic while collecting toll from such vehicles on all borders of Delhi.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
FEBRUARY 13, 2018 av
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this court should issue a writ of mandamus for addressing the alleged mismanagement of commercial vehicle traffic entry points into Delhi.
AMIT SAHNI
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA
C. HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
