Disposed

Dr. Disha and Ors. v. National Board of Examinations and Anr.

Delhi HC13 Feb 2018W.P.(C)/1319/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order disposing of a writ petition regarding NEET-PG entrance exam proceedings. Counsel for the respondent submitted that the respondent would satisfy the petitioner's prayers regarding the score list and belated submission of MBBS marks, rendering no further adjudication necessary.

What did the court decide?

None granted as the respondent undertook to satisfy the petitioner's prayers.

Dr. Disha and Ors. Vs National Board of Examinations… — Education and Admissions | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~39

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 1319/2018 & C.M. No.5515/2018

¶4

DR. DISHA AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through Mr.S.D. Singh, Adv. with Mr.Kamla Prasad, Adv.

¶5

versus

¶6

NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS AND ANR.. ...Respondents Through Mr.Kirtiman Singh, Adv. for R-1.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 13.02.2018

¶11

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, he is confining his prayers to prayers (a) & (e) made in the writ petition. Vide order dated 12^th February, 2018, learned counsel for the respondents was granted time to get instructions and today Mr.Kirtiman Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent fairly submits that the respondent no.1, while issuing the rank list proposed to be issued on 15^th February, 2018, will declare the score list and the merit position of all the candidates and thus the prayer (a) of the petition would stand satisfied.

¶12

As far as prayer (e) of the petitioner is concerned, he has sought a direction to respondent no.1 to consider the aggregate MBBS marks as furnished by the petitioner no.1 vide email dated 4^th February, 2018 if needed, at the time of considering, the issue of tie breaking. It may

¶13

be noted that the requirement of considering the petitioner’s marks in MBBS would arise, only in case an issue of ‘tie’ arises between candidates scoring equal marks in the NEET-PG Exam, 2018. Mr.Singh, further submits that, though the petitioners were required to submit their MBBS marks before 31^st January, 2018 but keeping in view the fact that the date of declaration of the merit list has been postponed, the respondent no.1 would consider the marks obtained by the petitioner no.1 in MBBS despite the same having been submitted belatedly.

¶14

Since no other relief is being pressed by the petitioner at this stage, nothing further survives for adjudication, the writ petition and application are disposed of in the above terms.

¶15

FEBRUARY 13, 2018/aa

¶16

REKHA PALLI, J

Dr. Disha and Ors. v. National Board of Examinations and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Disha and Ors. v. National Board of Examinations and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Executive Engineer (Civil) Sbpd, Prasar Bharti Vs M/S Era Infra Engineering Limited

Binil P.T. Vs the Govt. of Nctd and Ors.

Sunplast India Vs Commissioner, Trade & Taxes & Anr.

Sanjay Kumar Vs Union of India and Ors.

Niranjo Devi and Anr. Vs Deputy Commissioner Sadar Paharganj Zone and Ors.

New Delhi Municipal Council Vs G S Thind

Shaleen Kumar Goel & Anr. Vs the Maintenance Tribunal & Ors.

Amod Kumar Vs Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited (Tpddl)

Master Darim Ahmed (Minor) through His Mother Smt. Sajida Tabassum Vs Delhi Public School & Anr.

Nanak Chand Aggarwal Vs Government of NCT of Delhi

Milind Agarwal and Ors. Vs the Institute of Chatered Accountants of India

Naya Samaj Appejay Parents Association and Anr. Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Arisha (Minor) through Her Father Sh Mohd Shehzad Vs Delhi Public School & Anr.

Sarvoday College of Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.