The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal's rejection of an application seeking an opportunity to reappear for a Physical Endurance Test after failing it in 2016.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
SH. GANGA RAM ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.R.P.S.Bhatti, Advocate
versus
DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECATION BOARD AND ANR.
..... Respondents Through: Mr.Nitesh Kumar Singh, Advocate for Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat, St.Counsel for GNCTD (Services)
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R % 15.02.2018
Page 1 of 6
W.P.(C) 1313/2018
Page 2 of 6
W.P.(C) 1313/2018
despatch of a letter dated 28.06.2016, to the petitioner, calling upon him to participate in the PET, through speed post as also other public notices issued by the respondents/DSSSB, informing the candidates at large about the date of the Physical Endurance Test, are collectively handed over by the learned counsel for the respondents/DSSSB and taken on record.
Page 3 of 6
W.P.(C) 1313/2018
failed to qualify the PET, like the applicant. It transpires from the notice dt. 10.01.2018 (Annexure A-11) that on the basis of their performance in the written examination for the post of Warder (Post Code- 37/13) the respondent-DSSSB has declared certain additional candidates to have provisionally qualified for PET and has accordingly scheduled the PET to be held on and from 12.02.2018 to 16.02.2018 for them only and not for the candidates, like the applicant, who had earlier appeared but failed to qualify the PET in the year 2016. The applicant has not brought to our notice any provision in the Advt./Employment Notice (ibid) that in the event of failure of any candidate to qualify PET, the respondentDSSSB can subsequently allow such candidates to again appear for PET. Having failed to qualify the PET held on 02.07.2016, the applicant cannot be said to have any right to claim an additional opportunity to appear for PET."
Page 4 of 6
W.P.(C) 1313/2018
ascertain the mode of despatch of the said letter.
Page 5 of 6
W.P.(C) 1313/2018
HIMA KOHLI, J.
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
FEBRUARY 15, 2018 ‘hkaur’
Page 6 of 6
W.P.(C) 1313/2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a candidate who failed the Physical Endurance Test can claim a right to appear again for the test.
Sh. Ganga Ram
Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board
Hima Kohli
Pratibha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
