Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach appropriate authority. Court allowed withdrawal with liberty and disposed of pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
MS. SHERRY GARG ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Manish Aggarwal & Ms.Priyanka Kathuria, Advocates.
versus
D.A.P.M.R.V. DENTAL COLLEGE AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.T. Singhdev with Ms.Amandeep Kaur, Ms.Puja Sarkar, Mr.Tarun Verma, Ms.B. Das & Mr.Abhijit Chakrawarty, Advs. for R-2
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R
% 12.02.2018
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail appropriate legal remedy as permissible under law.
As prayed, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. The pending application also stands disposed of.
REKHA PALLI, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2018 gm
Ms. Sherry Garg
D.A.P.M.R.V. Dental College
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
