This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42
GTL INFOTEL (P) LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Debasish Moittra, Advocate
versus
BHARAT BROADBAND NET WORK LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ratan Singh & Mr.Aishwany Kumar Tiwari, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
Mr.Ratan Singh, Advocate, who appeared on advance notice states that neither any medium scale enterprise nor any PSU under the Department of Telecommunications has bid for the packages that the petitioner offered to bid.
In view of this statement, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
PRATEEK JALAN, J
NOVEMBER 14, 2018 ‘hkaur’
GTL INFOTEL (P) LTD.
BHARAT BROADBAND NET WORK LTD.
S. Ravindra Bhat
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
