The writ petition and connected application were dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner, who was granted liberty to take action in accordance with law.
Liberty to take action in accordance with law; petition and application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SAMRENDRA KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through : Petitioner in person
versus
SANDHYA ENTERTAINMENT AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for R-UOI
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 09.02.2018
CM No.5046/2018 ( exemption )
W.P.(C) 1216/2018 & CM No. 5045/2018
Dasti .
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
FEBRUARY 09, 2018/ kr
Samrendra Kumar
Sandhya Entertainment and Ors.
C.HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
