Petitioner restricted relief to a direction for the respondent to decide on specific representations. Court directed response within 10 working days and disposed of the writ petition along with connected applications without expressing opinion on other issues.
Directive to respond to representations within 10 working days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~54
versus
NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Ms. Shruti Dutt and Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
W.P.(C) 12012/2018 & CM Nos. 46540-46541/2018
After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his relief to a direction to the respondents to take a decision on the representations dated 31st August, 2018 and 6th September, 2018 annexed as annexure P-5 to the writ petition. The request is reasonable. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the other issues raised in the writ petition, the respondents are directed to take a decision on the aforementioned representations within a period of 10 working days from today and communicate it to the petitioner.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Needless to say, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the decision on his representations, his rights to avail legal remedies thereagainst would remain open.
All applications also stand disposed of accordingly.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
NOVEMBER 13, 2018/ kr
DR GANDHI VICKY HARIVADAN & ORS
NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS
HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
