A writ petition seeking leave to withdraw was allowed on withdrawal by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
DALIMI BALA MEDHI ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate.
versus
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurang, CGSC with Mrs. Biji Rajesh, Advocate.
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 04.12.2018
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
SANJEEV NARULA, J.
DECEMBER 04, 2018/ ss
Dalimi Bala Medhi
Union of India
S Muralidhar
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
