The High Court of Delhi allowed an application for extension of time, granting petitioners one additional week to deposit the FDR in compliance with prior directions. The application was disposed of relying on precedent.
Extension of time of one week granted to the petitioners to comply with directions to deposit FDR.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~63
versus
REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. P.S.Singh with Mr. Rajpal Singh & Dr. A.K.Singh, Advs. for R- 1 & 2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
CM Appl.No.16431/2018 in W.P.(C) 1142/2018
“i) allow the present application and grant extension of time of one week to the Petitioners to comply the directions contained in the order dated 07.02.2018.”
W.P.(C) 1142/2018 Page 1 of 2
extended to comply with the directions passed by order dated 7.2.2018. For the reasons given in the application, the prayer is allowed and time is extended for depositing the FDR by one week. 6. The application is disposed of in line with the directions given in order dated 20.4.2018 in W.P. (C) 3950/2018 titled: Vineet Bajpai and Anr. Vs. Registrar of Companies and Ors.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
APRIL 25, 2018 ak
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 1142/2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners be granted an extension of time to comply with directions passed in the order dated 07.02.2018.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vineet Bajpai and Anr. Vs. Registrar of Companies and Ors.Applied¶19
W.P. (C) 3950/2018 titled: Vineet Bajpai and Anr. Vs. Registrar of Companies and Ors.
Rajan Puri and Anr.
Registrar of Companies and Ors.
Rajiv Shakdher
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
