Allowed

M/S Ranjeet Brothers Taxi Services v. Shri Satya Prakash Singh and Anr.

Delhi HC19 Mar 2018W.P.(C)/11119/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition concerning labour disputes after the parties entered into a settlement agreement resolved all claims including reinstatement and wages. The petitioner agreed to pay the respondent a total sum as per terms.

What did the court decide?

The petition and CM application were disposed of on terms of the settlement agreement; petitioner bound to honour cheques and parties remain bound by settlement terms.

M/S Ranjeet Brothers Taxi Services Vs Shri… — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~21

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 11119/2017 & CM APPL. 45447/2017

¶4

M/S RANJEET BROTHERS TAXI SERVICES ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Shikha Sapra with Mr. Sumit Chander & Mr. Bharat Chadha, Advocates

¶5

versus

¶6

SHRI SATYA PRAKASH SINGH AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Awadhesh Kumar, Advocate for workman along with respondent No.1 in person. Mr. S.K. Sethi, Advocate for R-2

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL O R D E R

¶8

% 19.03.2018

¶9

Settlement agreement dated 06.03.2018 has been received from the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre by which both the parties have resolved and settled their all disputes amicably before the learned Mediator.

¶10

As per the settlement, the petitioner has agreed to pay a total of Rs. 2,25,000/- to the respondent no. 1. The terms and conditions of the settlement agreement reads as under:-

¶11

“a. That the First Party agreed to pay a total amount of Rs.2,25,000/- to the Second Party towards full and final settlement of all the claims including reinstatement in service, back wages, earned wages, gratuity and all other benefits whatsoever past, present and future.

¶12

b. The Second Party has also agreed to accept the total

¶13

amount of Rs. 2,25,000/- from the First Party towards his full and final settlement of all his claims including reinstatement in service, back wages, earned wages, gratuity and all other benefits whatsoever past, present and future.

¶14

c. That it is also agreed between the parties that the total settlement amount of Rs. 2,25,000/- shall be paid by way of following installments:-

¶15

i. Rs. 25,000/- in cash on 12.03.2018 before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi.

¶16

ii. Rs. 25,000/- vide Cheque no. 981741 dated 12.03.2018 drawn on Indian Overseas Branch, Karol Bagh, New Delhi.

¶17

iii. Rs. 35,000/- vide Cheque no. 981742 dated 10.04.2018 drawn on Indian Overseas Branch, Karol Bagh, New Delhi.

¶18

iv. Rs. 35,000/- vide Cheque no. 981743 dated 10.05.2018 drawn on Indian Overseas Branch, Karol Bagh, New Delhi.

¶19

v. Rs. 35,000/- vide Cheque no. 981744 dated 10.06.2018 drawn on Indian Overseas Branch, Karol Bagh, New Delhi

¶20

vi. Rs. 35,000/- vide Cheque no. 981745 dated 10.07.2018 drawn on Indian Overseas Branch, Karol Bagh, New Delhi.

¶21

vii. Rs. 35,000/- vide Cheque no. 981746 dated 10.08.2018 drawn on Indian Overseas Branch, Karol Bagh, New Delhi.

¶22

d. The First Party also undertakes that the cheque will be honored on the presentation and shall not be dishonored in any event.

¶23

e. The following cases are pending between the parties before various Courts/Tribunals, the details of which are as follows:-

¶24

i. W.P.(C) No. 11119/2017 titled as M/s Ranjeet Brothers Taxi Services vs. Satya Prakash Singh & Anr. pending before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi.

¶25

ii. An application under Section 33(c)(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for recovery of the Awarded amount in LIR No. 670/17 pending before the Competent Authority in Labour Department at Pusa Institute, Delhi.

¶26

iii. A claim under Payment of Gratuity Act pending before Controlling Authority, Dr. Rati Singh, Asst. Labour Commissioner, Labour Office, Pusa Institute, Delhi filed by the Second Party.

¶27

iv. A claim in regard to earned wages filed by the Second Party pending before Mr. U.K. Sinha, Authority under Shops Act at Pusa Institute, Delhi.

¶28

f. It is further agreed between the parties that all the above cases will stand withdrawn as satisfied. The Second Party shall not file any other claim with respect to any claim relating to employment or unemployment etc. against the First Party in present or in future.

¶29

g. It is further agreed between the parties that the First Party will sign and support the Second Party to withdraw the provident fund deposited with the PF Authority.

¶30

h. That both parties have agreed that the present Writ Petition bearing W.P. (C) No. 11119/2017 may be disposed of in terms of the present Settlement Agreement.

¶31

i. Both parties agree that they will maintain cordial relations with each other and will not cause any nuisance or hindrance in work and the Second Party shall not influence the smooth functioning of the business/employees of the First Party in any manner whatsoever.”

¶32

Learned counsel for the petitioner as also the respondent No.1 and his counsel confirm the Settlement Agreement dated 06.03.2018 which was arrived at before the learned Mediator.

¶33

Pursuant to the settlement agreement, learned counsel for the petitioner has handed over a sum of Rs. 25,000/- in cash and one

¶34

cheque No. 981741 dated 12.03.2018 for Rs. 25,000/- and five cheques of Rs. 35,000/- each bearing cheque Nos. 981742 to 981746, drawn on Indian Overseas Branch, Karol Bagh, New Delhi.

¶35

The petitioner shall ensure that whenever the cheques are presented for encashment within prescribed period, the same shall be honoured.

¶36

The parties shall remain bound by the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement dated 06.03.2018.

¶37

The petition and CM No. 45447/2017 are disposed of accordingly.

¶38

VINOD GOEL, J.

¶39

¶40

MARCH 19, 2018

M/S Ranjeet Brothers Taxi Services v. Shri Satya Prakash Singh and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Ranjeet Brothers Taxi Services v. Shri Satya Prakash Singh and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Madan Gopal Sharma Vs Government of India and Anr.

Entertainment Television Network Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Pawan Kumar Vs Staff Selection Commission

Satyendra Kumar Vs Maharaja Agarsain Public School (Recognized) & Anr.

Raj Degree College Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Milap Chand and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Daksh Bassi Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ashish Kumar Verma Vs Union of India and Ors.

M/S Indian Art Palace Vs Bhagwan & Anr.

Anil Arora Vs the Labour Commissioner & Anr.

Anil Arora Vs the Labour Commissioner & Anr.

Shanti Devi & Ors. Vs Food Corporation of India & Anr.

New Smart House Keeping Solution Pvt. Ltd. Vs Parvez

Management of Delhi Transport Corporation Vs Beg Raj Singh