Petitioner withdrew the writ petition to file a PIL. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of pending applications.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
DINESH S. THAKUR ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Trideep Pais, N. Sai Vinod and Ms. Sanya Kumar, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj and Ms. Akanksha Mishra, Advocates for UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R % 23.10.2018
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
OCTOBER 23, 2018 dr
DINESH S. THAKUR
UNION OF INDIA
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
