Naveen Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners challenging their rejection in a BSF typing test sought directions to declare them successful. The Court awaited confirmation on the evaluation method. Upon respondent counsel confirming the Key Depression Per Hour (KDPH) method was followed as per the advertisement and SOP, the petitions were disposed of as nothing further survived for adjudication.
What the court decided
$~21 to 35.
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 10501/2017 and CM APPL. 42975/2017 W.P.(C) 10532/2017 and CM APPL. 43108/2017 W.P.(C) 10533/2017 and CM APPL. 43110/2017 W.P.(C) 10604/2017 and CM APPL. 43423-424/2017 W.P.(C) 10636/2017 and CM APPL. 43553-554/2017 W.P.(C) 10638/2017 and CM APPL. 43583-584/2017 W.P.(C) 10641/2017 and CM APPL. 43590-591/2017, W.P.(C) 10642/2017 and CM APPL. 43593-594/2017, W.P.(C) 10643/2017 and CM APPL. 43602-603/2017, W.P.(C) 10644/2017 and CM APPL. 43604-605/2017, W.P.(C) 10647/2017 and CM APPL. 43613-614/2017, W.P.(C) 10661/2017 and CM APPL. 43636-637/2017, W.P.(C) 10662/2017 and CM APPL. 43638-639/2017, W.P.(C) 10663/2017 and CM APPL. 43640-641/2017 and W.P.(C) 10668/2017
AMIT KUMAR .....Petitioner ASHOK KUMAR YADAV ..... Petitioner MANOJ KUMAR YADAV ..... Petitioner DEEPAK ..... Petitioner RAMPAL ..... Petitioner PRAVEEN KUMAR ..... Petitioner HEMANT KUMAR ..... Petitioner DINESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner AMIT KUMAR ..... Petitioner NAVEEN KUMAR ..... Petitioner SUNIL KUMAR ..... Petitioner GOVIND SHARMA ..... Petitioner VIKASH SINGH ..... Petitioner SANDEEP ..... Petitioner RAHUL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Dibya Nishant and Mr.Gautam Mann, Advocates.
versus
W.P.(C) 10501/2017 & connected matters
Page 1 of 5
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, Advocate with Mr.Hem Kumar and Ms. Simmee Kumari, Advocates in W.P.(C) 10501/2017, W.P.(C) 10532/2017, W.P.(C) 10636/2017, W.P.(C) 10638/2017, W.P.(C) 10647/2017, W.P.(C) 10661/2017 and W.P.(C) 10662/2017 . Ms. Kailash Golani, Advocate in W.P.(C) 10533/2017, W.P.(C) 10604/2017, W.P.(C) 10641/2017, W.P.(C) 10642/2017, W.P.(C) 10643/2017, W.P.(C) 10644/2017, W.P.(C) 10663/2017 and W.P.(C) 10668/2017
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners had a right to be declared successful in the typing test after the result evaluation was clarified to follow the advertised Key Depression Per Hour (KDPH) method.
Whether the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) adopted by BSF for the typing test evaluation complied with the recruitment advertisement.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Amit Kumar
- petitioner
Ashok Kumar Yadav
- petitioner
Manoj Kumar Yadav
- petitioner
Deepak
- petitioner
Rampal
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court