Petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition (W.P.(C) 1061/2018) filed against East Delhi Municipal Corporation to make a representation to the SDM. The court dismissed the petition and connected application as withdrawn.
The petition and connected application were dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~49
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SH. YOGESH ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Seema Sharma, Adv.
versus
EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. G.D. Mishra, Standing Counsel with Mr. A.S. Meena, AE(Bldg.), Shahdra North Zone for R1. Mr. Rishikesh Kumar, Adv. for R2 to R5.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R % 05.02.2018
After some submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition to enable the petitioner make a detailed representation to the concerned SDM.
The petition and the connected application are dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
FEBRUARY 05, 2018 /jg
SH. YOGESH
EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
