The petitioners, having decided not to challenge the Tribunal order, were directed to appoint the respondent in a Group-D post within four weeks. The petition was disposed of together with the pending application.
Petitioners directed to appoint respondent in Group-D post within four weeks; dismiss petition and pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Mr. Abhishek Rana, Advocates and Mr. Om Prakash, J&CIT (HQ) (Litigation) and Mrs. Hitisha Ruhela, DCIT (HQ) (Personnel).
versus
SANDEEP KUMAR ..... Respondent
Through: None
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI O R D E R % 05.02.2018
%
HIMA KOHLI, J
PRATIBHA RANI, J
FEBRUARY 05, 2018/ rkb
Union of India & Ors
Sandeep Kumar
Hima Kohli
Pratibha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
