The single judge dismissed the criminal petition for non-prosecution and default. The court noted the petitioner failed to appear on multiple dates and did not serve the respondent, implying a lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution and in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~61.
Through:
versus
STATE OF (NCT) DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP along with SI Vijay Kumar, PS-Farsh Bazar, for the State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
O R D E R % 19.01.2017
None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called out. The order sheet shows that the petitioner has not taken any steps to serve the respondent even once. In fact, the petitioner has not appeared on 25.07.2016 and 10.11.2016. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the case.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and in default.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
JANUARY 19, 2017
B.S. Rohella
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition should be allowed to proceed when the petitioner does not appear or take steps to serve the respondent?
Rajesh Babbar
State of (NCT) Delhi
His Honour Justice Vipin Sanghi
As recorded by the court registry
A petition to transfer a criminal case from one court to another.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
