Single-paragraph order modifying an earlier order regarding the scope of a granted probate of a Will, specifically reconfident the property details while waiving the requirement to furnish a surety.
Application to modify the order dated 17th August 2017 is disposed of with confirmation of the waiver of surety.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
SHRI RAVI KANT SHARMA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate.
versus
STATE & OTHERS ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Pawas Agarwal and Mr. Vinayak Batta, Advocates for respondent No. 2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 26.09.2017 I.A. No. 11394/2017 (under Section 152 read with Section 151 CPC)
Will be confined to property No. J-92, Reserve Bank Enclave, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi-110063. However, vide order dated 17th August, 2017 allowing the application to the petitioner in the order it was also noted that the petitioner would furnish a surety. The said condition is however waived, as per the main order dated 13th July, 2017.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
SEPTEMBER 26, 2017 ‘yo’
Page 2 of 2
TEST.CAS. 3/2009
Shri Ravi Kant Sharma
State & Others
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
