appellant/plaintiff to prove that the respondent/defendant had executed in favour of the appellant/plaintiff the documentation dated 25.7.2012 being the agreement to sell, power of attorney, etc. Ex.PW1/1 to Ex.PW1/7. As already stated above, the appellant/plaintiff had sought to get the signatures proved through handwriting expert but that request was rejected and which rejection became final on an appeal against the order also being dismissed. Most importantly, the documents Ex.PW1/1 to Ex.PW1/7 cannot be relied upon because the appellant/plaintiff has failed to prove that any consideration of Rs.6,50,000/- was passed from the appellant/plaintiff to the respondent/defendant. Admittedly and conveniently this consideration of Rs.6,50,000/- is alleged to be paid in cash by the appellant/plaintiff to the respondent/defendant. Also, it is seen that the courts below have held that the appellant/plaintiff admittedly issued cheques of Rs.20,000/and Rs.60,000/in the year 2013 to the respondent/defendant/landlord/counter-claimant and which would not have been if there was no liability of the appellant/plaintiff towards rent and the appellant/plaintiff as claimed by him had already purchased rights in the suit property on 25.7.2012.
