The appeal was disposed of as not pressed by the appellant, as the trial court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to proceed in accordance with law, ensuring the appellant's rights would not be affected.
Appeal disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
KOSHAL RANI ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Kumar Mukesh, Advocate.
versus
BABU LAL & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 and 4. Mr. Sumit K. Batra, Advocate for respondent No.5.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 03.11.2017 1. After arguments, this appeal is disposed of as not pressed
inasmuch as trial court by the impugned judgment has only asked the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) to proceed in accordance with law and therefore once the MCD proceeds in accordance with law, then, the rights of the appellant would not be affected.
RFA No.925/2017 page 1 of 2
construction and the MCD Tribunal will decide the appeal in accordance with law as this Court has made no observations one way or the other on
merits of the matter.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
NOVEMBER 03, 2017 Ne
RFA No.925/2017
page 2 of 2
Koshal Rani
Babu Lal
Valmiki J. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
