Single judge order setting aside costs imposed on the appellant in a previous judgment, noting the appellant had handed over possession of suit premises to respondents, and agreeing that costs on DDA were set aside in a related matter.
Costs imposed on the appellant in the impugned judgment were set aside; appellant returned possession of premises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
KRISHAN LAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajeev K. Virmani, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pramod Ahuja, Advocate, Mr. Rishabh, Advocate and Ms. Amita Sachdeva, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sagar, Advocate for respondent No.2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 15.03.2018
dated 3.11.2017 in RFA No.918/2017.
page 1 of 2
RFA No.661/2017
no.2 with respect to claiming mesne profits, of course in accordance with
law, and in which proceedings appellant will always be entitled to plead all defences of facts and law.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
MARCH 15, 2018 Ne
RFA No.661/2017
page 2 of 2
KRISHAN LAL
UNION OF INDIA
VALMIKI J. MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
