Ramesh Mehta v. Krishan Lal
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed a revision petition challenging an eviction order but stayed execution until July 31, 2019, upon the tenant's undertaking to vacate, pay dues, and clear premises.
What did the court decide?
Eviction order stayed till 31st July 2019 subject to tenant vacating, paying arrears and future charges, and clearing dues.
What the court decided
$~1.
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- RC.REV. No.547/2016, CM No.43194/2016 (for stay) and CM No.25037/2017 (for stay).
RAMESH MEHTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Satya Bhushan, Adv. versus KRISHAN LAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Sharma, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
- O R D E R
- % 10.08.2017
- This Rent Control Revision Petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the order [dated 20th July, 2016 in RC/ARC No.794/16 of the Court of Rent Controller (Shahdara), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi] of dismissal of the application filed by the petitioner / tenant for leave to defend the petition for eviction filed by the respondent / landlord under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act and the consequent order of eviction of the petitioner / tenant from one shop in property bearing no.70A, Baldev Park, Delhi – 110 051.
- The petition was entertained and notice thereof ordered to be issued and the execution of the order of eviction stayed.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the eviction order can be rendered inexecutable subject to the tenant complying with court-accepted undertakings.
Whether the tenant's undertaking to pay arrears and future charges ensures comity with the order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAMESH MEHTA
- respondent
KRISHAN LAL
Coram
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court