Single judge order dismissing an application for extension of time to vacate a commercial shop. The court declined the request citing the clear mandate of a previous order and noting the premises were commercial, not residential.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Rajiv Arora and Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Advs.
Versus
JHALMAN SINGH
..... Respondent
Through None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R % 22.12.2017 C.M. No.47162/2017
This is an application seeking extension of time to vacate the premises; the premises had to be vacated (in terms of the order dated 04.05.2017) on or before 31.12.2017. This Court is not inclined to grant any extension of time in view of the clear import of the order dated 30.04.2017. This Court additionally notes that this is not a residential premises but a commercial shop.
Dismissed.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
DECEMBER 22, 2017 A
1 issue framed by the court
Whether time should be extended to vacate commercial premises beyond the expiry of the earlier order.
CHANDER PARKASH
JHALMAN SINGH
INDERMEET KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
