Disposed
Amar Sinha v. Sarita Sinha
Delhi HCMAT.APP./32/2008
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Court disposed of appeal regarding mutual consent divorce based on court-ordered settlement terms involving property transfer and payment, granting liberty to revive appeal if settlement fails.
What did the court decide?
Settlement terms ordered; appeal disposed of with liberty to appellant to revive if settlement not implemented.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~2
¶2
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- MAT.APP. 32/2008
¶4
AMAR SINHA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P.D. Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Atul Gupta, Adv. along with appellant in person. versus SARITA SINHA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. D.N. Goburdhan, Adv.
¶5
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
¶6
O R D E R % 16.08.2017
¶7
- Learned counsels for both the parties submit that the parties have agreed to dissolve the marriage by mutual consent on the condition that the petitioner shall provide residential flat bearing No.B-201, Sector-56, Gurgaon, Haryana to the respondent by means of a registered gift deed and shall make payment of Rs.66,00,000/- to the respondent in full and final settlement. It is submitted that the parties shall file a joint petition for resolution of marriage by mutual consent within a period of four weeks from today and this appeal be disposed of with liberty to the appellant to revive the same in the event of settlement not being implemented.
¶8
- The appellant present in Court along with counsel undertakes to abide by the terms of the settlement. The respondent shall file an undertaking to this effect within four weeks from today.
¶9
- The appeal is disposed of in terms of the settlement with liberty to the appellant to revive the same if the occasion so arises.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
AMAR SINHA
- respondent
SARITA SINHA
Coram
AI extract
J.R. MIDHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court