The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal order which dismissed his recovery application due to his default, holding that the appellant must pursue civil remedies or appropriate legal actions against the respondent to recover the amount paid.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS...... Respondents Through: Mr. Sankar N Sihna, Advocate for Respondent No.1/Insurance Co.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
MAC.APP. 563/2013 Page 1 of 2
order dated 15th July, 2009 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate (West), Delhi.
AUGUST 04, 2017 sm
J.R. MIDHA, J.
MAC.APP. 563/2013 Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant can recover the compensation paid to the victim from the victim personally given his default in proceedings before the Claims Tribunal?
Whether the appellant has any alternative remedy to recover the amount paid pursuant to the Magistrate's order when the motor accident claims proceeding is closed?
2 provisions across 1 enactments
MS. SIMINDER KAUR
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
