In an appeal seeking enhanced compensation for a motor accident death, the Delhi High Court dismissed the matter due to the appellants' default appearance, noting the Tribunal's approach was consistent with Supreme Court precedents.
None granted; appeal dismissed due to default appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-462
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Decided on: 10th November, 2017
SAFIQ & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Shaumik Mazumdar, Adv. for R-3
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
MAC Appeal No.199/2012
Page 1 of 2
to the fact that there were 6 claimants, it made deduction of one-fourth towards personal and living expenses.
R.K.GAUBA, J.
NOVEMBER 10, 2017 yg
MAC Appeal No.199/2012
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether compensation in a motor accident claim deserves enhancement given the appellants' failure to appear for hearing.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sarla Verma & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr.Relied on¶14
Sarla Verma & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., (2009) 6 SCC 121 · Who else cites this
MANJU DEVI & ORS.
SAFIQ & ORS.
R.K.GAUBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
