The Appellant failed to appear for hearing in MAC.APP. 1025/2011. The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal in default.
Appeal dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
BABY PRIYANCY
..... Appellant
Through: None.
versus
SAURAV KUMAR & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta for Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. for R-3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 07.11.2017
Inspite of the matter being called out several times since morning there is no appearance for the appellant. The matter was earlier passed over and has been taken up in the post lunch session but the situation remains the same till 2.30 p.m.
The appeal is dismissed in default.
R.K.GAUBA, J
NOVEMBER 07, 2017 nk
BABY PRIYANCY
SAURAV KUMAR & ORS
R.K. GAUBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
