The appellant sought to withdraw its appeal against a tax demand, having chosen to pay property tax under the 2016-17 Amnesty Scheme. The High Court dismissed the appeal reflecting the withdrawal.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11.
THE SANCHAR VIHAR COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. B.B. Jain, Advocate.
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Amita Gupta & Mr. Zahid Hanief, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
%
O R D E R 18.05.2017
Mr. Jain, learned counsel for the appellant states that the appellant wishes to withdraw the appeal since the appellant has opted for making payment of the property tax under the Amnesty Scheme of 2016-17.
The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
MAY 18, 2017 B.S. Rohella
THE SANCHAR VIHAR COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
VIPIN SANGHI
DEEPA SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
