Partly allowed

Gopal Krishan Kohli & Anr. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC6 Sept 2017LPA/585/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court directed the Appellate Tribunal to consider the appeal and related applications within ten days, including interim relief. The pending writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Stay dismissed; main appeal remanded to Appellate Tribunal for disposal within ten days with directions not to follow Single Judge's observations on possession; pending writ disposed of as withdrawn.

Gopal Krishan Kohli & Anr. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors. — Property and Title | Delhi HC (2017)

¶1

$~33

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- LPA 585/2017

¶4

GOPAL KRISHAN KOHLI & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Neeraj Yadav with Mr. Saurabh Seth and Mohd. Umar Iqbal Khan, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sachin Nahar, Adv. for R-1 & 2. Mr. Rajiv Garg with Mr. K.K. Aggarwal and Ms. Gayatri Aggarwal, Advs. for R-3.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

¶9

O R D E R % 06.09.2017

¶10

Caveat No.799/2017

¶11

Since the counsel for the respondent has entered appearance, caveat stands discharged.

¶12

CM No.32430/2017 (exemption)

¶13

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

¶14

LPA No.585/2017 & CM Nos.32429/2017 (stay) & 32431/2017 (condonation of delay)

¶15

We have heard counsel for the parties for considerable time and are of the opinion that the Appellate Tribunal which is seized of the matter should consider the appeal, especially the application for interim relief at its earliest LPA No.585/2017 Page 1 of 2

¶16

convenience and in any case within ten days from today and pass an order thereon. The Tribunal shall thereafter proceed to hear the appeal expeditiously and render final judgment, on all issues. All rights and contentions of the parties to urge the question of maintainability as well as the merits of the appeal are reserved.

¶17

The appeal as well as the pending applications are disposed of in the above terms.

¶18

The Appellate Tribunal shall not hold itself precluded or bound by the observations of the Single Judge as to the issue of possession.

¶19

In the meanwhile, the respondents are directed not to create any third party rights or interest in respect of the suit property.

¶20

Learned counsel for the appellant seeks liberty to withdraw the writ petition i.e. W.P.(C) No.5755/2016 pending on the file of the Court. Accordingly, W.P.(C) No.5755/2016 and LPA No.585/2017 are therefore disposed of as withdrawn.

¶21

Copy of the order be given dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.

¶22

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J

¶23

SUNIL GAUR, J

¶24

SEPTEMBER 06, 2017 kks

¶25

LPA No.585/2017

¶26

Page 2 of 2

Gopal Krishan Kohli & Anr. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gopal Krishan Kohli & Anr. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Aggarwal Vs Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors.

Vijay Mohan Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Roopram Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Maj Gen Gurdip Singh Wirk (Retd) & Ors. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Pr. Commissioner of Income TAX-9 Vs M/S. Times Internet Ltd.

Pr. Commissioner of Income TAX-9 Vs M/S. Times Internet Ltd.