The appeal was dismissed as the court found no justifiable reason to interfere with the Single Judge's discretion in declining to entertain the writ petition based on lack of territorial jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
CHAND SAHU BALA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Md. Ehraz Zafar with Mr. Akash Tyagi, Advs.
Versus
MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT & ORS
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Shambhu Chaturvedi, Advs. for R-1/UOI (MoHRD). Mr. Amit Bansal with Ms. Seema Dolo, Advs. for R-2/CBSE.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO O R D E R % 17.03.2017
By the order under appeal, the learned Single Judge declined to entertain the writ petition on the ground that this Court lacks territorial jurisdiction.
Having heard the learned counsel for both the parties, we do not find any justifiable reason to interfere with the discretion exercised by the learned Single Judge.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
CHIEF JUSTICE
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
MARCH 17, 2017 kks
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal against dismissal of writ petition on grounds of lack of territorial jurisdiction should be entertained.
CHAND SAHU BALA & ORS
MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT & ORS
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
