A tax tribunal appeal was dismissed after the court held that the revenue's question must be answered against it based on a prior decision of this Court regarding delay condonation.
The appeal was dismissed against the Revenue in view of a prior decision of this Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 12 NEW DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Asheesh Jain, Sr.Standing Counsel.
versus
SUDHIKSHA SINGH ..... Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
O R D E R % 12.09.2017
C.M. No. 27422/2017 (delay of 58 days in filing)
ITA No. 600/2017
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
SEPTEMBER 12, 2017/ ‘anb’
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
CIT v. Renu Constructions Pvt. Ltd.Referred¶11
ITA No. 499/2011 (CIT v. Renu Constructions Pvt. Ltd.)
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 12 NEW DELHI
SUDHIKSHA SINGH
S. MURALIDHAR
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
