This revenue appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was dismissed by the Delhi High Court, relying on a prior order dated 19.12.2016, holding that no substantial question of law arose.
The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-1 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate.
versus
M/S COMPTEL OYJ. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
O R D E R % 11.09.2017
Page 1 of 2
ITA 598/2017
present appeal is also dismissed as, in the considered view of the Court, no substantial question of law arises in the present appeal as well.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
SEPTEMBER 11, 2017 dk
Page 2 of 2
ITA 598/2017
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)
M/s Comtel Oyj.
S. Muralidhar
Prathiba M. Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
