The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeals filed by Travelport L.P. against the Commissioner of Income Tax, holding that the legal question raised was already decided earlier by this Court in a similar matter involving the same assessee.
The appeals are dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4 & 5
versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-3, NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Prakash Kumar, Advocate, for appellant, in Item Nos. 4 and 5. Dileep Shivpuri, Sr. Standing Counsel with Sh. Sanjay Kumar and Sh. Vikrant. A. Maheshwari, for respondent, in Item NOs. 4 and 5
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R
% 01.03.2017
We notice at the outset that the question of law urged by the assessee in this appeal is identical to the one decided by this Court in Director of Income Tax v. Galileo International Inc. 2009 (2) TMI 497 (Del) as well as the assessee’s case for previous years [ Travelport L.P. USA v. CIT & connected matters, ITA Nos. 298-299/2016 & 302/2016, decided on 09.11.2016].
The appeals are accordingly dismissed.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
MARCH 01, 2017/ajk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the question of law urged by the assessee is identical to a previous decision of the Court.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Director of Income Tax v. Galileo International Inc.Explained¶9
Director of Income Tax v. Galileo International Inc. 2009 (2) TMI 497 (Del)
Travelport L.P. USA v. CIT & connected mattersExplained¶9
Travelport L.P. USA v. CIT & connected matters, ITA Nos. 298-299/2016 & 302/2016
Travelport L.P., USA
Commissioner of Income Tax International Taxation-3
S. Ravindra Bhat
Najmi Waziri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
