The Court granted an application for exemption. The appeal was dismissed because it was not pressed by the appellant, with leave granted to withdraw both the appeal and the connected stay application. The application has been disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
INDANI GLOBAL PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Sanjeev Narula & Mr.Ansuman Upadhyay, Advs.
versus
NEERAJ KUMAR VISHNOI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA
O R D E R
%
03.03.2017
CM No.8547/2017 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
FAO(OS) (COMM) 55/2017 & CM No.8548/2017 (for stay)
Leave is granted to the appellant to withdraw the appeal and the connected stay application with liberty to pursue the other remedies available to the appellant.
The appeal is dismissed as not pressed and the connected application is also disposed of.
INDIRA BANERJEE, J
YOGESH KHANNA, J
MARCH 03, 2017/ gm
Indani Global Private Limited & Anr
Neeraj Kumar Vishnoi & Anr
Indira Banerjee
Yogesh Khanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
