In a special leave appeal against an order dismissing an Order 39 Rule 4 CPC application, the High Court of Delhi dismissed the appeal as it was not pressed by the learned counsel for the appellants at the time of hearing.
The appeal was dismissed as not pressed at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~76
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL DEWAS & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mrs Prathiba M. Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr Umesh Mishra, Adv. versus DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY ..... Respondent Through: Mr Puneet Mittal, Adv. with Mr Rupendra Pratap Singh, Ms Vasudha Bajaj, Mr Amitez Kumar, Mr Sagar Mittal and Ms Arushi Tangri, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR O R D E R % 07.02.2017 CM 4221/2017
The delay is condoned.
The application stands disposed of.
FAO(OS) (COMM) 27/2017 & CM 4219/2017
The learned counsel for the appellants, on instructions, submits that she does not press this appeal at this stage inasmuch as the Order 39 Rule 4 CPC application being IA No. 542/2017 is pending before the learned Single Judge and the next date of hearing is 01.03.2017. She submits that she will make all relevant submissions in that application.
The appeal is dismissed as not pressed at this stage.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
FEBRUARY 07, 2017/kb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the special leave petition shall be allowed in the circumstances that the applicant does not press the appeal at this stage due to a pending interim application.
Delhi Public School Dewas & Ors.
Delhi Public School Society
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
