A one-line order dismissing an execution petition where counsel failed to address the procedural conversion regarding a specific performance agreement.
The execution petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S SANJEEV SONIA INDUSTRIES & ORS ..... Decree Holders Through: Mr. Kunal Malik, Adv.
Versus
PHOOL SINGH & ORS ..... Judgement Debtors Through: Mr. Kartik Jindal and Mr. Joseph K. Antony, Advs. for JD-2/DDA. Mr. A. Rasheed Qureshi, Adv. for objector Masjid Zeenat.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW O R D E R
% 12.01.2017
had agreed to pay to the plaintiffs/decree holders an amount of Rs.1,65,00,000/- for land admeasuring 285 sq. meters; the said order records the further terms agreed between the plaintiffs on the one hand and the said objector Masjid Zeenat on the other hand.
Page 2 of 3
EX.P. 313/2008
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.
JANUARY 12, 2017 Bs..
Page 3 of 3
EX.P. 313/2008
M/S SANJEEV SONIA INDUSTRIES & ORS
PHOOL SINGH & ORS
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
