Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition modifying the record. The High Court of Delhi disposed of the writ petition and miscellaneous applications accordingly.
Leave to withdraw writ petition granted; petition and miscellaneous applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC with SI Rajnish PS Prashant Vihar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 17.03.2017
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that impugned order would be
challenged by filing revision petition. He seeks leave to withdraw present writ petition.
Disposed of as withdrawn. Miscellaneous applications are disposed of as infructuous.
Dasti.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
MARCH 17, 2017/ dk
Manohar Lal Kohli
State NCT of Delhi
A.K. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
