Disposed
Avinash Kumar v. State
Delhi HCCRL.A./74/2001
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No.74/2001 & connected matters Page 1 of 3…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~
STATE ...Respondent
Through: None. With
And
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA
O R D E R % 16.12.2017
Para 92 of the judgment dated 14th December 2017 in Crl A No. 74 of 2001 and batch shall stand corrected to read as under:
“92. Many of the accused have served close to six years of imprisonment and were thereafter released on bail. These are all uniformed policemen who are expected to maintain law and order and not take law into their
Crl. Appeal No.74/2001 & connected matters Page 2 of 3
own hands. They are expected to act responsibly with a view to protecting the life and liberty of the citizens.”
S. MURALIDHAR, J
I.S. MEHTA, J
DECEMBER 16, 2017/ Rm
Crl. Appeal No.74/2001 & connected matters Page 3 of 3
AVINASH KUMAR
STATE
S. MURALIDHAR
I.S. MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court