Allowed

Mohd Ezaz Ahmed & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Delhi HC9 Feb 2017CRL.M.C./547/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the petition to quash FIR No. 1125/2014 registered under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC. The court found that the dispute between the parties had been settled amicably with the consent of the complainant, who had received compensation. Consequently, no useful purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.1125/2014 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and all proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

Mohd Ezaz Ahmed & Ors. Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Delhi HC (2017)

¶1

$~54

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 547/2017

¶4

MOHD EZAZ AHMED & ORS ..... Petitioners

¶5

Through : Mr.R.N.Jha, Advocate along with petitioners in person.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP with SI Sanjay Kumar, PS Shakarpur. Dr.L.S.Chaudhary, Advocate with Mr.Ajay Chaoudhary, Mr.Parambir Singh & Mr.V.Chaudhary, Advocates for R2 along with R2 in person.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R % 09.02.2017

¶9

CRL.M.A.No.2355/2017 (Exemption)

¶10

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

¶11

The application stands disposed of.

¶12

CRL.M.C. 547/2017

¶13

Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.1125/2014 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at PS Shakarpur. It is stated that the matter has been settled amicably with the complainant / respondent No.2 vide settlement agreement dated 22.02.2016. CRL.M.C. 547/2017 page 1 of 2

¶14

Complainant / respondent No.2 is present with counsel and has been identified by the Investigating Officer. I have enquired from the complainant if she has settled the dispute with the petitioners amicably without any fear or pressure. She has informed that all the disputes between the parties have been resolved amicably with her free consent and she has no objection to the quashing of the FIR in question. The complainant further informs that pursuant to the settlement of both the FIRs (FIR No.1125/2014 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at PS Shakarpur and FIR No.18/2014 registered under Sections 354/506 IPC at PS Burari) ` 50,000/- (in cash) has been paid to her today by the petitioners. Statement to that effect has been recorded separately.

¶15

The petition is supported by affidavits of the parties. Copy of settlement agreement dated 22.02.2016 has been placed on record. Since the dispute between the parties has been settled, no useful purpose will be served to continue with the proceedings. In the interest of justice and to enable the parties to settle in life after divorce, FIR No.1125/2014 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at PS Shakarpur and all the proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

¶16

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

¶17

S.P.GARG, J

¶18

FEBRUARY 09, 2017 / tr

¶19

page 2 of 2

¶20

CRL.M.C. 547/2017

¶21

Crl.M.C.547/2017 & Crl.M.C.548/2017

¶22

Statement of Respondent No.2 – Rukhsar, D/o Mohd. Mohsin, R/o J-54, 1^st Floor, Gali No.12, Ramesh Park Part-II, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-110092.

¶23

On S.A.

¶24

I have settled the disputes with the petitioners amicably through counselling. Pursuant to the settlement, I have received remaining amount of ` 50,000/- (in cash) today in the court. I have no objection to the quashing of the FIRs (FIR No.1125/2014 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Shakarpur and FIR No.18/2014 under Sections 354/506 IPC registered at Police Station Burari) and all the proceedings emanating therefrom.

¶25

R.O. & A.C. 09.02.2017

¶26

S.P.GARG (JUDGE)

Mohd Ezaz Ahmed & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd Ezaz Ahmed & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Atul Anand Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Aakash Sinha Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Pradeep Kuamr Vs Jain Cooperative Bank Ltd. & Anr.

Kush Parti & Ors. Vs State & Anr.

Sh Jitender Khari Vs State

Sharukh Vs State (Nct of Delhi)