Mohd Khalid & Ors. v. State & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court Delhi quashed FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC after complainant confirmed amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce without fear or pressure.
What did the court decide?
FIR No.304/2014 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom quashed.
What the court decided
$~45
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.M.C. 426/2017 & Crl.M.A.1899/2017
MOHD KHALID & ORS.
..... Petitioners
Through : Mr.Absar Ahmad, Advocate along with petitioners present in person.
versus
STATE & ANR.
..... Respondents Through : Mr.Arun Kr.Sharma, APP. Mr.Prashant Chaudhary, Advocate for R-2 along with complainant/R-2 present in person. SI Thakur Singh, PS Chandni Mahal Central District.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
O R D E R
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC should be quashed in light of amicable settlement and divorce by mutual consent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mohd Khalid
- respondent
State
- respondent
Complainant
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court