This Court quashed an FIR under Section 498-A IPC and related proceedings as the petitioner and respondent had amicably settled the dispute, granted divorce, and finalized payment terms before the court.
Quashing of FIR No. 386/2013 under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC and proceedings pursuant thereto.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
KAPIL KAPOOR
..... Petitioner Represented by: Ms. Gita Dhingra, Advocate.
versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & A NR.
..... Respondents Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State with PSI Sanjay Khatri, PS Uttam Nagar. Mr. Ravinder K. Batra, Advocate for respondent No.2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 09.01.2017 Crl. M.A. 241/2017 (exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 41/2017
thus, he is the only accused being tried in the above noted FIR and respondent No.2 is the only complainant.
question.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JANUARY 09, 2017
Page 3 of 3
CRL.M.C. 41/2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR and proceedings should be quashed given the settlement between parties.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
KAPIL KAPOOR
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
