Suraj Bhan v. Bimla & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court Delhi application for restoration of criminal miscellaneous petition dismissed in default and for non-prosecution as applicant was absent and steps for service could not be taken. No order on merits delivered.
What the court decided
$~6
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.M.C. 3046/2012
SURAJ BHAN ..... Petitioner Through: None.
versus
BIMLA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Vivek Maindola, PS-Dwarka Sector23.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL O R D E R % 20.07.2017
Crl. M. A. No. 260/2017 (For restoration) and 261/2017 (Delay in filing of restoration application)
This is an application for restoration of Cr. Misc. Main Petition No. 3046/2012.
As per office report, steps have not been taken to serve the respondent Nos. 1 to 5 in terms of order dated 10.04.2017. None has appeared on behalf of the applicant since morning despite repeated pass overs. It appears that the applicant is not interested to pursue the matter.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Suraj Bhan
- respondent
Bimla & Ors.
Coram
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court