Quashed

Sanni Kumar Yadav @ Sunny & Anr. v. State & Ors.

Delhi HC15 Sept 2017W.P.(CRL)/1861/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi quashed an FIR registered under Sections 365/34 IPC following a mediation settlement where the mother of the accused expressed satisfaction with the petitioner-partners living together happily and consented to their marriage.

What did the court decide?

The FIR bearing No.230/2017 registered under Sections 365/34 IPC and proceedings arising out thereof are quashed.

Sanni Kumar Yadav @ Sunny & Anr. Vs State & Ors. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Delhi HC (2017)

¶1

$~26

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(CRL) 1861/2017 & Crl.M.A. 10350/2017 SANNI KUMAR YADAV @ SUNNY & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Anuj Tomar, Adv. with petitioners in person.

¶4

versus

¶5

STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr.Piyush Singhal, Adv. for Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for State with SI Bhagwati Prasad, P.S. Nangloi. Ms.Ruchi Kapur, Adv. for R-5 with respondent No.5 in person.

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL

¶8

O R D E R % 15.09.2017

¶9

Respondent no. 5 is present in court. She is being represented by her counsel. She is duly identified by IO SI Bhagwati Prasad.

¶10

Mediation Settlement Agreement dated 13^th September, 2017 has been received from the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. By this settlement, the respondent no.5 has amicably settled the matter with the petitioners.

¶11

The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ‘Cr.PC’) to protect their life and liberty from respondent no.5 and for quashing of the FIR bearing No.230/2017, registered on 11.06.2017 against petitioner no.1 with Police Station Nangloi, Outer District, Delhi, under Sections

¶12

Page 1 of 2

¶13

W.P. (Crl.) No.1861/2017

¶14

365/34 IPC on the complaint of respondent No.5, who is the mother of petitioner no.2.

¶15

On 5^th July, 2017 this Court had directed the SHO, Police Station Nangloi, to provide necessary protection to both the petitioners. Both the petitioners and mother of the petitioner no.2, who is impleaded as respondent no.5, confirm the mediation settlement agreement dated 13^th September, 2017.

¶16

Respondent no.5 submits that she now has no objection with regard to the marriage of her daughter (petitioner no.2) with the petitioner no.1. She submits that she is satisfied that both the petitioners are living together happily.

¶17

The respondent No.5 states that in view of the settlement and her satisfaction that her daughter is being taken care of by the petitioner no.1, she does not want to pursue the said FIR. She submits that the said FIR may be quashed.

¶18

Since the parties have amicably settled all their disputes, no fruitful purpose would be served in further pursuing the said FIR. Hence, to secure ends of justice, the FIR bearing No.230/2017, registered on 11.06.2017 with Police Station Nangloi, Outer District, Delhi, under Sections 365/34 IPC and proceedings arising out of the said FIR are hereby quashed.

¶19

The petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶20

Crl.M.A. No. 10350 also stands disposed of. DASTI .

¶21

VINOD GOEL, J.

¶22

SEPTEMBER 15, 2017/jitender

¶23

Page 2 of 2

¶24

W.P. (Crl.) No.1861/2017

Sanni Kumar Yadav @ Sunny & Anr. v. State & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanni Kumar Yadav @ Sunny & Anr. v. State & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surinder Batra & Ors. Vs State & Anr.

Rabbani @ Sameer Vs State

Manoj & Ors. Vs State & Ors.

Jitender @ Jeetu Vs State (Gnct of Delhi)

Ram Prakash Bhatia Vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Kamal Kumar Kothari Vs Centrla Bureau of Investigation

Sourabh Sharma & Ors. Vs the State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Mishty Arora Vs SHO Ps Saraswati Vihar

Rafique Vs the State ( Govt of NCT Delhi)

Nazim Vs the State ( Govt of NCT Delhi)

Rahis Vs State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi)

Shri Nitesh Kumar & Ors. Vs State & Anr.

Manish Seghal Vs State Gnctd & Ors.

Ms Neha & Anr. Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.