The court dismissed an application for cancellation of bail as misconceived for not falling within the main petition scope. The writ petition was disposed of without reviewing a prior order, rendering remaining prayers surplus.
Application dismissed as misconceived; Writ Petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 1 + WP (CRL) 1796/2017
MANOJ TOKAS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Khahna and Mr.; "Darshan, Advocates versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Kamna Vohra, Additional standing counsel. SI Ranveer Singh, PS Vasant Vihar. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR
O R D E R % 07.07.2017
IA No. 10549/2017 (cancellation of bail)
WP (Crl.) 1796/2017
S.MURALIDHAR, J
JULY 07, 2017/ Rm
Manoj Tokas
State & Ors.
S. Muralidhar
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
