Disposed
Kiran Jhanji v. State & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/160/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41.
KIRAN JHANJI
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Somnath Bharti & Mr. Kunal Anand, Advocates.
versus
STATE & ORS.
..... Respondents Through: SI Mohit Parkash, PS- Hari Nagar, for the State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
O R D E R % 18.01.2017
dated 11.06.2004. The petitioner states that she could not repay the said loan on account of financial crisis. The petitioner claims that without following the procedure prescribed under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act), the respondent No.4 bank sold the said property in public auction. The petitioner has grievance with regard to the valuation of the said property and the price at which the said property was sold.
fair and expeditious investigation of the petitioner’s complaint.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
JANUARY 18, 2017
B.S. Rohella
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain a writ petition when a pending application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. addresses the same alleged forgery.
Whether the delay in disposing of the Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. application warrants the quashing of reliefs sought without prejudice to jurisdictional powers.
Whether the petitioner's failure to challenge the property sale prior to its conclusion precludes the Court from entertaining the grievance to register an FIR.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
KIRAN JHANJI
STATE & ORS.
VIPIN SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court