Application filed regarding violation of contempt order dated 28.8.2016 was held wholly misconceived and not maintainable; application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
AMARJIT SINGH JOLLY ..... Petitioner Through Mr. J.P. Singh, Adv.
versus
MR.P.K.GUPTA NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THR ITS COMMISSIONER AND ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Adv. for North DMC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R % 14.07.2017
CM No. 24076/2017 (for initiating contempt proceedings)
This application has come to be filed in a contempt petition disposed off on 22.8.2016. Said contempt petition was filed on the premise that the respondents had violated order dated 13.8.2015. In the instant application, the grievance is for the violation of another order dated 28.8.2016. The application is wholly misconceived and is dismissed, being not maintainable.
A. K. CHAWLA, J
JULY 14, 2017 rc
Amarjit Singh Jolly
North Delhi Municipal Corporation
A. K. Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
